"Pointing out that 'M' married his favorite (and last) wife, Aisha, when she was 6-7 and he was 50+ is a red line for Muslims. Noting that 'M' wrote all of his peaceful Koranic passages while he was living in Mecca, but became increasingly violent and intolerant after he moved to Medina is a red line for Muslims. Stating that 'M' wrote that non-Muslims, a/k/a infidels, should be given three choices -- pay the jizya (a tax on non-believers), convert to Islam, or fight -- is a red line for Muslims. In other words, disagreeing with Islam is a reason for Muslims to become violent -- and everyone should appreciate the implications of that."
All except the last sentence can be verified via Wikipedia -- jizya, Aisha, and Muhhamad -- with the last sentence being a logical conclusion of pandering to Islam at the expense of other religions. The Religion of Peace contains pretty much every violent act committed by Muslims around the world, most of which is not reported by Western media.
The Hill censored my post almost immediately.